State v. Hazel, 08ap-789 (2-26-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Corey M. Hazel is appealing from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He assigns five errors for our review:
[I.] The Trial Court Erred to the Prejudice of the Defendant when the Trial Court ruled only on the Amended Post Conviction Petition filed March 28, 2008, and disregarded Defendant's Original Post Conviction Petition that was filed September 4, 2007, Denying Defendant's Due Process of Law.
[II.] The Trial Court Erred to the Prejudice of the Defendant in ruling that Trial Counsel was competent to handle a Mortgage Fraud Case.
[III.] The Trial Court Erred to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Hazel, 08ap-1002 (5-7-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State ex rel. Hazel v. BenderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HazelOhio Supreme Court · 2009