Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hazel v. Bender

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2010No. 2009-2309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the claim of appellant, Corey Hazel, for a writ of procedendo to compel appellee, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge John F. Bender, to enter judgment on Hazel’s September 4, 2007 petition for postconviction relief. Hazel had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law by appeal to raise his claim, and he raised it in State v. Hazel, Franklin App. Nos. 08AP-789 and 08AP-790, 2009-Ohio-880, 2009 WL 497584, at ¶ 8. Procedendo does not lie when the relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Woods v. Oak Hill Community Medical Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. New Concept Housing, Inc. v. MetzOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Hazel, 08ap-789 (2-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jelinek v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Hazel v. BenderOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API