Legal Opinion
State v. Hazel, 08ap-1002 (5-7-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 2009No. Nos. 08AP-1002, 08AP-1003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Corey M. Hazel ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court denied his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, motion for default judgment, and motion for summary judgment.
{¶ 2} The relevant facts follow. In case No. 05CR-7105, the Franklin County Grand Jury indicted appellant for one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, one count of theft, 17 counts of forgery, 15 counts of securing writings by deception, and 13 counts of money laundering. In case No. 06CR-4742, the Franklin County…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BartonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bank One Trust Co., N.A. v. Transamerica Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. Hazel, 08ap-789 (2-26-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. NooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. PorterfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. HazelOhio Supreme Court · 2009