Legal Opinion

Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. Territory

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Submission Upon Agreed Statement of Faots.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C. J.

The facts agreed upon by the parties are as follows:

“The Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Company is a cor> poration, duly organized and existing under the laws of the Territory of Hawaii and incorporated under the provisions of the Act of July 7, A. D. 1898, to hold, and is holding and exercising, the franchise and privileges granted in said Act, and has constructed and is maintaining and operating a street railway in Honolulu, in said Territory of Hawaii; said franchise having been ratified subject to the approval of the President under the provisions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rochester Railway Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. City of Detroit v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Lansing v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lord v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Reinhardt v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In re a Submission on Agreed Facts in a Controversy Between Bishop & MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Motaghedi v. BlinkenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API