Legal Opinion

City of Lansing v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari to Ingham; Person, J. Mandamus by the city of Lansing to compel the Lansing City Electric Railway Company to pave with brick between its tracks. From an order granting the writ, respondent brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

In June, 1895, a petition was filed in the Ingham circuit asking an order against the respondent *124to show cause why mandamus should not issue requiring it to pave with brick that part of Washington avenue, in the city of Lansing, from Kalamazoo street south to the bridge across Grand river, lying between the rails of its track, and on each side of its track, to the end of its ties. In answer to an order to show cause the respondent made return, and on the hearing in the circuit court that court determined that the respondent should pave with brick such portions of the street between its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Detroit v. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. TerritoryHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. City of Vincennes v. Vincennes Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. City of Owosso v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Township of Ross v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API