Legal Opinion

Beal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1950No. 11072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The appellants were firefighters employed by the War Department at the Lexington Signal Depot, a United States Army-installation. They were required to be on-duty under the so-called two-platoon system, 24 hours on and 24 hours off, and to* remain alert within the confines of the depot during each 24 hour tour of duty, except for an 8 hour interval for sleep and: meals, ready at all times to respond to fire ■calls. Their tour of duty totaled 168 hours-every two weeks, or an average of 84-hours per week. After deducting the al lowable time for sleep and meals this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Maryland v. Baltimore Radio Show, Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Burnap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. In Re: M.P.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. United States v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Walsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Opinion No. Oag 1-75, (1975), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API