Legal Opinion

Spokane v. LABOR AND INDUSTRIES

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 1983No. 4651-6-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 Wn. App. 581 (1983)

663 P.2d 843

THE CITY OF SPOKANE, Appellant,

v.

THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, ET AL, Respondents.

No. 4651-6-III.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

May 5, 1983.

James C. Sloane, Corporation Counsel, and Christine Cary and Patrick Dalton, Assistants, for appellant.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Thomas R. Chapman, Assistant, and Thomas M. Smith, for respondents.

ROE, C.J.

Claimant Robert A. Wilson suffered an industrial injury. The Department of Labor and Industries found him 25 percent disabled. Upon appeal to the Board of Industrial Insurance…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. LoewenWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Batten v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Curtis Lumber Co. v. SortorWashington Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Fay v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Vasquez v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API