Legal Opinion

Dixon Shoe Co. v. Moen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The case is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to a complaint on the ground of insufficiency of facts.

From .the complaint it appears that the plaintiff sold a bill of goods to O. H. Hove, who was conducting a general store, and the goods sold were not wholly paid for. Hove sold his entire stock of goods to Burr Dickie for cash which he deposited to his credit in the defendant bank and after making the deposit drew and sent to plaintiff his check on the bank for the balance due the plaintiff for the goods. Before the check was cleared Hove died and the county court of Sauk county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krzysko v. GaudynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bardon v. HartleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of MulliganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  2. Miller v. Northern BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Stein v. SorefWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Guardianship of ThorntonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Ratcliff v. Phi Pi Phi Housing Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API