Miller v. Northern Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Before the passage of the Negotiable Instruments Law (ch. 356, Laws of 1899) it was the rule in this state that the giving of a check for value on an ordinary bank deposit was intended as an assignment of the fund pro tanto as between the maker and the payee. Raesser v. National Exchange Bank, 112 Wis. 591, 88 N. W. 618. That rule was abolished by the Negotiable Instruments Law. Under that act a check of itself no longer operates as an assignment of any part of the funds to the credit of the drawer with the bank, and the bank is not liable to the holder, unless and until it accepts or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Raesser v. National Exchange BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Dixon Shoe Co. v. MoenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Denver Electric & Neon Service Corp. v. Gerald H. Phipps, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Weaver Construction Co. v. Farmers National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
- Anschutz v. Central National Bank of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Strickland Transportation Co. v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1948