Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 6, 1986No. Nos. 85-5186 to 85-5198 and 85-5269 to 85-5271PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Acting Chief Judge.
The Food Stamp Program is designed to serve beneficial purposes, improving the nutrition and diet of less advantaged Americans and promoting the distribution and growth of this nation’s agricultural products. 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (1982). It is financed and administered by the federal government, but participating states share considerable responsibility for managing the program.
These appeals present two important questions concerning this shared responsibility: the extent of state liability to the federal government for certain erroneous issuances of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Golden Acres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Christopher v. Montgomery County Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.