Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Montgomery County Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 2004No. 103, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

This case requires us to consider whether a food stamp recipient must be receiving disability benefits in order to be entitled to an “uncapped” “excess shelter cost deduction” under the Maryland Food Stamp Program. Determining that “receives” means “actual receipt,” we conclude that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter the “ALJ”) that the appellant must actually be receiving disability benefits to be entitled to the uncapped excess shelter cost deduction was correct, and we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, which had affirmed…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lyng v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. County Council v. Zimmer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Schwartz v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API