Heritage Mutual Insurance v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.
This case involves the interpretation of "other insurance” clauses which require multiple insurers to bear proportionate liability for insured losses. Because we conclude that the pro rata share between insurers is based on the stated policy limits rather than the coverage available to the insured through "stacking,” we affirm.
Heritage Mutual Insurance Company (Heritage) and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (St. Paul) had issued automobile liability policies to Darryl Zernia. Heritage insured four of Zernia’s vehicles under one policy, with uninsured motorist coverage of $25,000 per person.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Cunningham v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Burns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Gurney v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Keane v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989