Legal Opinion

Bankers Trust Co. v. Foto

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1942No. Docket No. 16, Calendar No. 41,910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Bankers Trust Company, Detroit, Michigan, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Frank G. Smith, deceased, has been substituted as plaintiff in this case originally brought by Frank G. Smith in his lifetime against Anna Mary Foto. Many of the pertinent facts in the case are set forth in Smith v. Foto, 285 Mich. 361 (120 A. L. R. 801), in which we reversed the order of dismissal before a hearing. Two opinions were filed in the case, four Justices in the short opinion concurring in the result, so that all that was decided was that the bill contained allegations conferring…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pettiford v. ZoellnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Smith v. FotoMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stepanian v. MoskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kretzschmar v. RosascoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zirkalos v. ZirkalosMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cooper v. AmanaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Nance v. GentryMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API