Bradford v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARNES, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), filed on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). (Doc. 48). Union Pacific seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims en toto based on preemption by federal regulations. Plaintiffs have responded. (Doc. 67). Union Pacific has replied to Plaintiffs’ response. (Doc. 71). The Court held a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss on January 5, 2007. (Doc. 98). The matter is ripe for consideration.
I. BACKGROUND
Just before 5:00…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ShanklinSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MD Mall Associates, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- MILESCO v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In re: East Palestine Train DerailmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Locke v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2021
- MD Mall Associates, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013