Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided June 7, 2007No. 05-CV-4075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARNES, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), filed on behalf of Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). (Doc. 48). Union Pacific seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims en toto based on preemption by federal regulations. Plaintiffs have responded. (Doc. 67). Union Pacific has replied to Plaintiffs’ response. (Doc. 71). The Court held a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss on January 5, 2007. (Doc. 98). The matter is ripe for consideration.

I. BACKGROUND

Just before 5:00…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. ShanklinSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MD Mall Associates, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. MILESCO v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In re: East Palestine Train DerailmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  4. Locke v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2021
  5. MD Mall Associates, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API