Legal Opinion

MILESCO v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 2011No. 1:09-cv-01233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Pending before the Court is Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff ACF Industries, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claims for Lack Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Federal Preemption). (Doc. 127). For the following reasons, we shall deny the pending motion.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY and FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On June 5, 2009, Plaintiff filed suit against ACF Industries, LLC, (“ACF”), Norfolk Southern Corporation, and Nor folk Southern Railway Company (collectively the “Norfolk Defendants”) for negligence and products…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Little v. Budd Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  3. SHIELDS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Witters v. SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API