Lloyd Co. v. Wyman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Millard J.
— This action was instituted by a domestic corporation to recover against M. A. Wyman and wife and H. A; Wyman Lumber Company, a corporation, arid a' copartnership composed of Theodore F. Anderson and wife, Conrad Nelson and wife, and Louis Torvinen and wife, doing business as Swartz Lake Lumber Company, for materials alleged to have been furnished and delivered to the copartnership under the terms of a . written agreement between H. A. Wyman and the copartnership. Thereafter, plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which is not materially different from the original complaint, on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldie-Klenert Distributing Co. v. BothwellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Collins v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- McKenzie v. Puget Sound National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Seiffert Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Leytham v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goss v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Stowell Lumber Corp. v. WymanWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Hite Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Washington Belt & Drive Systems, Inc. v. Active ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989