In Re Nomination Papers of Lahr
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 29th day of October 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED. Opinion to Follow.
Before CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, JJ.
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE.
This Opinion is filed in support of this Court’s unanimous per curiam order of October 29, 2003, which granted Lahr’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal and reversed the Commonwealth Court’s order in this election matter. See In re: Nomination Papers of Joe Lahr, 577 Pa. 1, 842 A.2d 327 (2003). The practical effect of our order was to permit…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Ross Nomination PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Commonwealth v. RevtaiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Pa School Boards Ass'n, Inc. v. Com., Public Sch. Employees'retirement Bd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re Nomination Petition of BrownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.