Legal Opinion

Kartheiser v. American National Can Co.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided December 3, 1999No. 4-98-CV-90339PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PRATT, District Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendant American National Can Company’s (“American Can”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff John Kartheiser’s (“Kartheiser”) action alleging breach of an agreement to pay him overtime and violation of the Iowa Wage Payment Collection Act. Plaintiff resisted the Motion and Defendant filed a reply brief; the matter is considered fully submitted. This case, before the Court on diversity jurisdiction, is controlled by Iowa law. See Frideres v. Schiltz, 113 F.3d 897, 898 (8th Cir.1997).

I. Statement of Facts 1

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Bristol, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
  2. Owen v. MBPXL CORP.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  3. HAWKE YE COMMODITY PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  4. Brondyke v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
  5. Meier v. Family Dollar Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API