Richardson v. City of Casper
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
It is alleged in the petition filed in this case in the trial court on December 12, 1932, that the City of Casper, in 1931, created special improvement district No. 8 for the construction of sewers in accordance with Chapter 120, Sess. Laws 1915, embodied in Section 22-1501, R. S. 1931 and subsequent sections, the cost and . expense thereof to be paid by special assessments levied against the benefitted property in the district; that assessments were duly levied, and bonds were issued in the amount of §38,194.15, to defray such cost and expenses; that plaintiff is now and for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peake v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Moore v. City of NampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Town of Capitol Heights v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Union Trust Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Henning v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Bankers Life Co. v. EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Guernsey v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Henning v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1936