Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henning v. City of Casper

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1936No. 1905Published

1Concurrence

Kimball, Ch. J.

(concurring in the result).

The plaintiff’s petition states several causes of action, on different theories, for a money judgment against the city. Plaintiff contends that the original assessments are invalid, and that the city has no power to make re-assessments. Our decision assumes that the city, in spite of the judgments in the previous actions by the bondholders against the property owners, may still have the power to collect the original assessments. If the original assessments are invalid, we see no rea son for holding that re-assessments should not be made. Our order in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Likes v. City of RollaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Richardson v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API