Legal Opinion
Mann v. Haigh
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1997No. 96-1869PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge COPENHAVER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
COPENHAVER, District Judge:
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing his complaint. We affirm.
I
Plaintiff was employed from 1982 to September 30, 1994, by the Morale, Welfare and Recreation Directorate at a Marine Corps station in Cherry Point, North Carolina (Directorate). The Directorate is a nonappropriated fund instrumentality (NAFI), which provides recreational services and goods at the Cherry Point station. A NAFI is a branch of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- McLean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Davis v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Kursar v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Chandler v. BernankeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pathak v. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.