Legal Opinion
Hall v. South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1998No. 3:96CV01493(GLG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Defendant South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority (“the Water Authority”) has moved for summary judgment on all counts of plaintiffs employment discrimination complaint. The thrust of Water Authority’s motion is that, even assuming that plaintiffs allegations are true, plaintiff has failed to allege any illegal discrimination occurring within the relevant limitations periods. Plaintiff, however, relies on a “continuing violation” theory to bring the otherwise time-barred conduct within the limitations periods.
Because our resolution of the legal issues…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adeniji v. Administration for Children ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Ortiz v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Timmons v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003