Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Prudential Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 22, 2000No. 3:97CV2150 (JBA)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND RULING [DOC. # 38]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Ortiz (Ortiz) claims that the defendant Prudential Insurance Company (Prudential) terminated him because of his national origin in violation of Title VII. The defendant denies that national origin played any role in its decision to terminate Mr. Ortiz’ employment, and asserts that he was terminated because he repeatedly violated company rules and collective bargaining agreement provisions prohibiting outside employment during the workweek. Defendant moved for summary judgment, to which plaintiff responded, and the Court…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Adams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lunardini v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Adams v. Department of Mental Health of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Gaie v. Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Grebla v. Danbury HospitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.