Legal Opinion

Clark v. Rockwell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1818PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Debt on a bond to review does not lie originally to this Court.

If brought here, the defendant cannot have judgment for his costs.

Debt on bond conditions to prosecute a writ of review. The action was originally brought to this Court; and on motion of the counsel for the defendants, the Court dismissed it, as having no original jurisdiction of the suit.

moved for costs; but the Court overruled the motion, on the ground taken in the case of Williams vs. Blunt. (1) (a)

On the admission of Counsellors and Attorneys.

Ordered, that, hereafter, any gentleman who is duly qualified for admission as an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIver v. WattlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. The EleanorSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  3. Williams v. BluntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  4. Brown v. DelanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hart v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Williams v. BluntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  4. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
  5. Thomas v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API