Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The facts upon which this case must be determined are as follows:

Jacob Bitz brought his suit in the District Court of Essex county, against Michael Meyer, for malicious prosecution.

The judge of the District Court found that Meyer had maliciously instituted a civil suit by summons, against Bitz, in a justice’s court at Caldwell, upon the trial of which Meyers testified that both he and Bitz were residents of the city of Newark, and thereupon the justice dismissed said suit for want of jurisdiction, the jurisdiction in such case being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Montalet v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  2. McIver v. WattlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. King v. PooleNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Steele v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  5. Dixon v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Vickey v. NesslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Fielder Agency v. Eldan Construction Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Johnson v. Walker-Smith Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API