Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Jordan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 1984No. C6-83-1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from denial of a writ of mandamus directing respondent City of Jordan to execute a contract for garbage collection services. Appellant Mark Johnson, doing business as Mark’s Sanitation [hereafter, Mark, or Mark’s], submitted the low bid. Although the bid was not accompanied by a bid bond, as required, the City Council passed a resolution awarding the contract to Mark’s, subject to submission of a bid bond, which Mark’s submitted the following day. Before a written contract was executed, the Council reconsidered, citing the lack of a timely bid bond,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Foley Brothers, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Tunny v. City of HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Gaastra v. Village of FairwaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horsfield Construction, Inc. v. Dubuque CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. E. H. Oftedal & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Montana Transportation CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. E. H. Oftedal & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Montana Transportation CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Op. Atty. Gen. 707a, Minnesota Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API