Johnson v. City of Jordan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from denial of a writ of mandamus directing respondent City of Jordan to execute a contract for garbage collection services. Appellant Mark Johnson, doing business as Mark’s Sanitation [hereafter, Mark, or Mark’s], submitted the low bid. Although the bid was not accompanied by a bid bond, as required, the City Council passed a resolution awarding the contract to Mark’s, subject to submission of a bid bond, which Mark’s submitted the following day. Before a written contract was executed, the Council reconsidered, citing the lack of a timely bid bond,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Foley Brothers, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Tunny v. City of HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Gaastra v. Village of FairwaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horsfield Construction, Inc. v. Dubuque CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- E. H. Oftedal & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Montana Transportation CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- E. H. Oftedal & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Montana Transportation CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Op. Atty. Gen. 707a, Minnesota Attorney General Reports1993