Legal Opinion

Gaastra v. Village of Fairwater

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1977No. 75-259PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The question is whether acceptance of a bid by a municipality is a precondition to forfeiture of a bidder’s deposit. We hold that acceptance of the bid is a prerequisite to forfeiture.

In March 1972 the defendant village of Fairwater advertised in a trade paper soliciting bids for construction of sanitary sewers, lift stations, a waste stabilization pond and other items which were part of a pollution prevention project for the Grand River. The advertisement required a bid deposit as follows:

“Proposals shall be accompanied by a Certified Check or Bid Bond payable to the Village of Fairwater in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson Inc. v. Sewerage Comm. of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Ludtke v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. Krasin v. Village of AlmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Merrill v. Wenzel Brothers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. 5 Walworth, LLC v. Engerman Contracting, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Marana Unified School District No. 6 v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Johnson v. City of JordanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Village of Turtle Lake v. Orvedahl Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API