Legal Opinion

In re Vohra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*62OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on April 17, 1989, as Robert Naresh Vohra. He was also admitted to the bar of the District of Columbia in 1990 and currently maintains a law practice with an office in Alexandria, Virginia.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3 disciplining respondent based upon similar discipline imposed by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals or, in the alternative, sanctioning respondent as this Court deems appropriate.

By order dated…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re LeavittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In Re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In re BlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re LaSalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re AdinolfiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In re JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Matter of ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. In re GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API