Legal Opinion

Action Wholesale Liquors v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 2006No. CIV-06-0239-FPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FRIOT, District Judge.

This action requires the court to determine whether Oklahoma constitutional and statutory provisions governing the distribution of wine in Oklahoma violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution (U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl.3). Specifically, three Oklahoma liquor wholesalers have sued the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission and individual members of that Commission, 1 alleging that the 2000 amendment to Article 28, Section 3 of the Oklahoma Constitution, and conforming state statutes, are unconstitutional. 2 The challenged state…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jelovsek v. BresdenDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
  2. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. SchnorfDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Brinkmeyer v. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2007
  5. Original Investments LLC v. State of OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API