Legal Opinion

Czap v. Credit Bureau of Santa Clara Valley

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1970No. Civ. 26367PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

Appellant Joan Czap sued to enjoin respondent credit bureau from garnishing her wages in execution of a $250 judgment for attorney fees incurred in a divorce action. She alleges that respondent rejected her offer to pay the judgment in installments and that repeated levies are threatened despite respondent’s knowledge that all but $45 weekly of appellant’s wages are exempt from execution under Code of Civil Procedure section 690.11. The complaint alleges that repeated garnishments of wages jeopardize appellant’s employment and that respondent’s purpose is thereby to force…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bowden v. Spiegel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Wetherton v. Growers Farm Labor Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. McIvor v. Mercer-Fraser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McGill v. Citibank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Black Panther Party v. KehoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Clark Equipment Co. v. WheatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API