Legal Opinion

T. R. Foley Co. v. McKinley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1911No. Nos. 17,028-(47)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action in the district court for Crow Wing county to recover $1,464.75, balance alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before McClenahan, J., who, at the close of the trial, denied the motions of plaintiff and defendant Hoerr for a directed verdict. The jury returned a verdict against defendant McKinley for the amount demanded.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Crow Wing county to recover $1,464.75, balance alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before McClenahan, J., who, at the close of the trial, denied the motions of plaintiff and defendant Hoerr for a directed verdict. The jury returned a verdict against defendant McKinley for the amount demanded. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment against defendant Hoerr notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial, he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action, for goods sold, .originating in the district court of the county of Crow Wing. The complaint alleged that the defendants were partners doing business under the firm name of George A. McKinley, and that the plaintiffs, from March 30 to August 9, 1907, at their request, sold and delivered to them goods of the reasonable value of $1,714.75, no part of which has been paid, except the sum of $250. The answer of the defendant Hoerr denied the alleged partnership, also the sale of any merchandise to the defendants, and alleged that the goods in question were sold to the defendant McKinley…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. McAlpine v. MillenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. McDonald v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Gomulak v. C. A. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. State v. FellowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  2. O'Connor v. West Sacramento Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Florence v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Meagher v. FogartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API