Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2004No. COA03-460PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Franklin McNeil (“defendant”) appeals his convictions for possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine and attaining habitual felon status. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence presented at trial tends to show the following: On 31 August 2001, Durham County Police Department Officer J.R. Broadwell (“Officer Broadwell”) was investigating a complaint that drug sales were occurring in front of a residence located on 1108 Fargo Street. As Officer Broadwell approached the 1100 block of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. MewbornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. BlaggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API