Legal Opinion · Concurrence

White v. Douglas

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 6, 1924No. 11522Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Marion

(concurring) : The opinion of Mr. Justice Fraser correctly states and defines the limits of the Circuit Court’s discretionary power, under subdivision 2, § 430, Code Civ. Proc. 1922, with respect to rendering personal judgment in a foreclosure proceeding. The point involved in Berry v. Caldwell, 121 S. C., 418; 114 S. E., 405, was whether the Circuit Judge should be held to have committed reversible error of law in failing to render a personal judgment at the time the decree of foreclosure was rendered. In Citizens Bank v. Davis (S. C.), 119 S. E., 580, personal judgment in a foreclosure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Schmid v. WhittenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. Sumner v. BankheadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Citizens Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API