Legal Opinion
Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum & D'Errico v. Ronan
New York District Court
Decided April 29, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SONDRA K. PARDES, J.
Defendant moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing the complaint in this action.
This is an action to collect legal fees. The complaint alleges that these fees are due and owing based on “an oral contract between plaintiff and defendant” and based on quantum meruit. Plaintiff asserts that on or about June or July 2002, the defendant, Gregory Ronan (Ronan), and his law firm (GRD), “engaged” plaintiff to represent Ronan and GRD in two matters pending in New York County Supreme Court. Plaintiff asserts that it provided substantial legal services…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mulcahy v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Hunt v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Kayden v. KaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Marini v. D'ApolitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re RoosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v. GaneaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Estate of FeroletoNew York Surrogate's Court · 2004
- Lewin v. Law Offices of Godfrey G. BrownCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Grossman v. West 26th Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Silver Huntington Enterprises, LLC v. Davidoff & Malito, LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2006