Legal Opinion

In re Roosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in 1997. He maintains his law office in New Berlin, Chenango County.

Having granted the motion of petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, for an order declaring that no factual issues are raised in this matter (see, 22 NYCRR 806.5), and having heard respondent in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct and impose the following discipline.

Respondent falsely notarized the signatures of two clients on documents he submitted to courts in support of an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum & D'Errico v. RonanNew York District Court · 2003
  2. In re BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API