Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, plaintiffs motion denied without prejudice and award of attorney’s fees vacated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to strike plaintiffs submissions based on the failure of plaintiffs attorney to file the requisite certifications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.16 (e) and 130-1.la. Pursuant to section 202.16 (e), “[e]very paper served on another party or filed or submitted to the court in a matrimonial action shall be signed as provided in section 130-1.la of this Title” (22 NYCRR 202.16 [e]). Section 130-l.la (a) requires a party’s attorney…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cardo v. Board of ManagersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Bishop v. BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Johnner v. MimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum & D'Errico v. RonanNew York District Court · 2003
  5. In re the Arbitration between Cara Serazio-Plant & ChanningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API