Legal Opinion

United States v. Winter

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1941No. 8966Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

The defendant was indicted under section 37 of the Criminal Code, 35 Stat. 1096, 18 U.S.C.A. § 88, for conspiring with one Fred Kaplan to violate Section 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, ch. 720, 54 Stat. 894, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 311.

Kaplan testified before the grand jury returning the true bill, pleaded guilty to the offense charged, and testified for the Government during the prosecution of the defendant, who was found guilty and who now moves for a new trial.

*628The most strongly urged reason for a new trial is that counsel for the defendant has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hornick v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Chambers v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. Glenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Hedley v. SnipesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Knowlton v. Seneca Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API