Legal Opinion

Glenberg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1922No. 3727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against John Glenberg and another. Judgment of conviction, and defendant Glenberg brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error, John Glenberg, and one Hyman Goldman, were convicted on a joint indictment charging them .with the illegal possession of morphine in violation of the Revenue Act of December 17, 1914, commonly known as the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Daw, as amended by sections 1006, 1007, of the Revenue Act of 1918 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 6287g, 62871). Motion for new trial was overruled,- and sentence imposed.

[1] It is insisted upon behalf of plaintiff in error that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial based upon the ground of newly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. Orchard Land & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  2. Laurie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Morton Butler Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. State v. BunkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Chambers v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API