Knowlton v. Seneca Engineering Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence comes too late. In the absence of a statute, the court is without jurisdiction to grant relief after the expiration of the term at which the decision was rendered; the term not being extended by order. This rule applies to civil and criminal actions. Even where a term has been extended for filing and signing a bill of exceptions, a motion for a new trial on newly discovered evidence is not maintainable. Harley v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 269 F. 384. In United States v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pickford v. TalbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Fuller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- In re MaherDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Delaware & Hudson Co. v. StankusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- United States v. WinterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941