Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1987No. C4-87-1014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Walter V. Nelson, purchased parcels of real property from respondent, George N. Nelson, on a contract for deed, and built homes on two of the parcels. One home was sold. Appellant subsequently defaulted on contract payments and was served with notice of cancellation. He then filed a mechanics’ lien and notice of lis pendens against the improved lot and brought a mechanics’ lien foreclosure action and an unjust enrichment action against respondent. The trial court granted a partial summary judgment in favor of respondent on the mechanics’ lien foreclosure…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Litchfield v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Conley v. DowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Marr v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chaney v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. Phenix Biocomposites, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Independent Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. In Re StromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Palatine National Bank of Palatine v. Strom (In re Strom)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API