Legal Opinion

In RE MARRIAGE OF ULRICH v. Cornell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1992No. 90-1220PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issue in this case is whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel can be invoked in a child support proceeding to hold a stepparent responsible for child support when allegedly the stepparent makes a representation to adopt and support the child. This is an appeal from the postjudgment order of the Milwaukee county circuit court, Judge Clarence R. Parrish, which declared that the stepfather, John T. Ulrich, Jr., was "estopped from denying an obligation to provide continued support for the child, Jesse Cornell."

The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court's decision by concluding that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Farris v. FarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Siemering v. SiemeringCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Schmidt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Vorvilas v. VorvilasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weinand v. WeinandNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. D.R.M. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. E.H. v. M.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Eh v. MhSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API