In RE MARRIAGE OF ULRICH v. Cornell
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.
The issue in this case is whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel can be invoked in a child support proceeding to hold a stepparent responsible for child support when allegedly the stepparent makes a representation to adopt and support the child. This is an appeal from the postjudgment order of the Milwaukee county circuit court, Judge Clarence R. Parrish, which declared that the stepfather, John T. Ulrich, Jr., was "estopped from denying an obligation to provide continued support for the child, Jesse Cornell."
The court of appeals affirmed the circuit court's decision by concluding that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Farris v. FarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Siemering v. SiemeringCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Schmidt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Vorvilas v. VorvilasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weinand v. WeinandNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. D.R.M. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- E.H. v. M.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Eh v. MhSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994