Legal Opinion

Lemke v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1954No. 13342PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of attempting to obtain money by false pretenses in violation of § 65-5-81, Alaska Compiled Laws Ann., 1949. 1 His brief upon this appeal 2 contains no specification of errors as is required by Rule 18(d) of this court and therefore may be said to present nothing for review. United States v. Cushman, 9 Cir., 136 F.2d 815; United States v. Shingle, 9 Cir., 91 F.2d 85; Walton v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co., 9 Cir., 123 F. 209. However, we have the power to notice a plain error even though not properly brought to the attention of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lemke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Walton v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Leroy J. BusseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Amy Everston JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. Salvatore J. Ciullo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API