Legal Opinion

Continental Gin Co. v. Sims

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1924No. 13391PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

The sole question for determination is the correctness of the action of the trial court in determining the priority of the lien of Antrim Lumber Company ov.er the chattel mortgage of the Continental Gin Company, and involved® in this determination is the incidental question of the effect of an agreement between the mortgagor and the mortgagee that the gin machinery should be deemed and considered personal property.

Upon the question of priority and notice the applicable provisions of Comp. Stat. 1921, are as follows:

“See. 7650. A mortgage of personal property is void as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Great Western Manufacturing Co. v. BathgateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. Arnold v. WittieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. First Nat. Bank of Vinita v. GuessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Snodgrass v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. National Bond & Inv. Co. v. Central Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Henry v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. C.I.T. Financial Services v. Premier Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API