Legal Opinion

Laney v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1983No. Docket 67050PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this wrongful death case is what standard of care is applicable to a public utility which maintains electric power lines near trees accessible to children. We hold that the reasonable care standard is applicable and consequently that the trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury that a "high degree of care” standard was applicable. We also hold, however, that the reasonable care instruction given in this case was defective and that reversal is required because it failed to inform the jury that application of the standard in this case required the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Frederick v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Warren v. City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Huber v. Twin City General Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Case v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. McMillan v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. First of America Bank-Central v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  5. In re Skidmore EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API