Legal Opinion
SEB SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 2001No. 99 Civ. 9284(BDP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff, SEB S.A. (“SEB”) commenced this action in August 1999 against Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 1 Global-Tech Appliances, Inc., and Pentalpha Enterprises Ltd. (“Pentalpha”), claiming that a deep fryer, marketed by Montgomery Ward LLC and manufactured by Pentalpha, infringed United States Patent No. 4,995,312 (the “ ’312 Patent”). See 35 U.S.C. § 271.
On December 15,1999, this Court, based on Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated November 23, 1999, issued a preliminary injunction against…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SEB SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- SEB, SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Giantceutical, Inc. v. Ken Mable, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005