Haines v. United States

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 2:14-cr-000264-APG-VCF 4 Plaintiff Order Denying Defendant’s Motion Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

5 v. [ECF No. 343] 6 SHA-RON HAINES, 7 Defendant 8 Defendant Sha-Ron Haines moves to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 9 U.S.C. § 2255. Haines argues that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to effectively 10 distinguish two cases the Ninth Circuit relied on in denying Haines’s direct appeal. Haines 11 argues counsel failed to distinguish that United States v. Elbert1 involved consent,…