Legal Opinion
Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1994No. 92-56543PublishedCited by 456 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WIGGINS.
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Nathaniel James is a state prisoner who petitions for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He appeals from a district court’s order denying his petition and dismissing it with prejudice. Petitioner challenges his state murder conviction primarily on the ground that his Sixth Amendment right to be informed of the nature and cause of the charge was violated. Petitioner also asserts that his Sixth Amendment right to receive effective assistance of counsel at trial was denied and that his Fifth Amendment right against…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by456 opinions
- Hendricks v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Calvin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.A. GOMEZ, Warden, and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Matthews v. EvattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose M. Quintero-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
451 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.