Legal Opinion

Keith v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1976No. 7614SC92PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The record shows that plaintiff was a customer at defendants’ store at the time she was injured. While defendants are not insurers of the safety of their customers they do have a duty to exercise ordinary care to keep the premises in reasonably safe condition, and to give warning of unsafe conditions insofar as they are known or should be known by reasonable inspection. Routh v. Hudson-Belk Co., 263 N.C. 112, 139 S.E. 2d 1 (1964) ; Long v. Food Stores, 262 N.C. 57, 136 S.E. 2d 275 (1964) ; Mitchell v. K.W.D.S., Inc., 26 N.C. App. 409, 216 S.E. 2d 408 (1975).

Defendants’ position…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Tolbert v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Sanders v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Routh v. Hudson-Belk Co. of Asheboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Garvin v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Trexler v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API