Legal Opinion

In Re Harmon

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 22, 1990No. 19-41384PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OVERRULING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO PLAN

STEVEN W. RHODES, Chief Judge.

The trustee objects to confirmation of the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan on the grounds that it fails to provide for all of the debtor’s net disposable income. 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).

The debtor is a married man, living with his working wife. Apparently, they split their living expenses equally. The debtor’s budget proposes to calculate his net disposable income by deducting one half of the total family expenses from his after-tax income.

The trustee contends that the debtor’s net disposable income should be calculated by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Winifred Doersam, Debtor. State of Ohio, Student Loan Commission v. Winifred Doersam and George W. LedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re KernUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. In Re KourtakisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. In Re CarbajalUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
  2. In Re McNicholsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. In Re BottelbergheUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  4. In Re RothmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Halper v. Halper (In Re Halper)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API