Legal Opinion

Janesville State Bank v. Aetna Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1937No. 31,274PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This was a suit to recover the benefits of a $2,000 life insurance policy upon the life of Emil L. Hofmann which was in the hands of the plaintiff bank at the time of Hofmann’s death. At the time of his death Hofmann was indebted to the plaintiff in a sum in ex cess of $2,000. From a judgment, in favor of plaintiff against both defendants this appeal is taken.

June 18, 1932, Hofmann, being indebted to the defendant bank, left with it the life insurance policy here in question. His wife, Clara, the other defendant in this action, was named beneficiary therein. No written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Opitz v. KarelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ellis v. KreutzingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  3. Potter v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Redden v. Prudential Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Travelers' Insurance v. HealeyNew York Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Mutual Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  2. Petty v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Peel v. ReibelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Matthew Luxton v. United States of America, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Miller v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. (In Re Investment & Tax Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API